Trump tweets U.S. should deport people immediately, TRANSCRIPT: 6/25/2018. All In - new york times chinese restaurant review hot dish

Show: date with Chris Hayes: guest of June 25, 2018: Richard Blumenthal, Natalia conelio, Dan Ning, Dan Dick, Nick Ackman, Natasha ·
Start Video Editing)
Chris Hayes, MSNBC host: all in tonight.
US President Donald Trump: I don't want a judge, I want border patrols, I want ice.
We don't want a judge.
Hayes: Donald Trump has demanded an immediate deportation.
Have you heard of such a thing, judges?
Hayes: Tonight, the president recently called for the rule of law to be lifted, forcing asylum seekers to choose between their children and their deportation.
Civil society then responded to the Trump administration.
Unidentified male: Do you think it is a civil policy to separate more than 2,000 children from their parents?
Hayes: and the classic American company that is now the victim of Donald Trump's trade war.
TRUMP: You can't lose the trade war.
Hayes: Why did the top Democrats in the Senate say they want to spend a wild summer with Robert Miller?
Trump: It's fake political persecution.
Hayes: Now when everything starts (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: Good evening. This is Chris Hayes.
Every day, the president of the United States seems more and more like an authoritarian strongman from a country that we no longer recognize as our own.
The latest demonstrations today are often seen on Twitter, "We can't allow all of these people to invade our country.
When someone comes in, we must immediately bring them back from where they came without a judge or a court case.
Our system is a mockery of good immigration policies and legal order.
Now, you can write off Donald Trump's constant Twitter storm as just some anger, if not because of what's actually happening in our country at the moment.
The 2,300 migrant children taken from their families, some of them toddlers, and even babies who build tent cities at military bases, we may add, we only have pictures provided by the government, because the media are not allowed to record what is happening in it independently.
So far, the refusal of asylum seekers at the port of entry is consistent with our own laws.
According to the Texas Tribune, our government has actually held many migrant children who were taken away by their parents, and our government has deprived them of their rights as hostages, forcing people to abandon their legal asylum application and agree to be deported.
This is the context in which the president explicitly calls for the arbitrary expulsion of the people without recourse to the legal system or recognition of the rule of law.
But for anyone who wants to dismiss the president's tweet this morning, he re-discussed the topic later in the day. (
Start Video Editing)
We must change our laws.
We must make them wise.
They came to see me last week and they said we wanted to hire another 5,000 judges, 5,000.
Have you heard of such a thing, judges?
Well, we have 145 judges appointed here, and everyone has gone through this extreme review process, not about 5,000 judges.
Where did you find 5,000 judges?
Do you know what caused it?
It can lead to corruption and it can lead to many other things. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: The president is a little confused about immigration judges, who are very different from the appeals and district court judges he appointed, but this is another time.
Now it has passed.
A series of remarks by the president showed that he was too lazy to even pretend to care about the Constitution without covering it up.
But when this world view is put into practice among vulnerable groups at the border, we are currently seeing a very bleak picture.
Last week, Connecticut Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal visited the tent city for immigrant children in Torillo, Texas, and maybe let me ask you what it looks like when you see itSEN.
Richard blumenthal (D)
Chris, as you have reported in the past few weeks, this is a heartbreaking, deepening humanitarian crisis.
Again, in all of these policies, the president uses children as pawns and hostages.
He first tried to put pressure on lawmakers to change the law, but now he doesn't. Then, in order to convince some of these asylum seekers, if they are reunited, to leave the country without a unified plan, and even more and more chaos and confusion between border agents, border patrols and US Customs and border guards say we need more judges.
In order to enforce the law effectively and fairly, we need more resources.
Thus, the abandonment and abolition of due process has consequences not only economically but also morally.
I ask you this question.
I mean you are a US senator, and we have consistent reports that CBP will shut out people at the port of entry when applying for asylum, they even moved the checkpoint to the center of the bridge in some cases so that there would be no toe exposure to the soil in the United States.
On the face of it, this is a violation of US law.
What did Congress do about it?
BLUMENTHAL: Congress has done nothing very sadly and unconsciously.
I believe that I am calling on Congress now and in the next few days to hold hearings.
We are responsible for supervision.
My Judicial Committee should hold a hearing this week to hold officials accountable for refusing asylum seekers at the port of entry, in fact denying the credible fear hearing they are entitled to in this country, and the due process was abolished.
Keep in mind that due process is not only about fundamental fairness and the rule of law, but also about ensuring that the award is accurate.
Because in many cases, if we refuse asylum unfairly and inaccurately, it is very likely that we will actually condemn the deaths, torture and other forms of violence of these people.
Hayes: Let's make it clear that it's not just them.
I mean, please correct me if I am wrong.
What the president is calling for is extra --
Legally irresponsible and irresponsible
Deportation units that can be reviewed can take people out of the country without judicial review.
Is there any reason to believe that such a thing a, is it constitutional or B, will not result in the expulsion of American citizens?
BLUMENTHAL: it will be challenged and when challenged it will be found to be illegal and against the constitution.
But from a broader and more fundamental perspective, the train wreckage that the country is moving towards the border, because, in addition to the due process issues and due process hearings for asylum seekers at ports of entry, I said we were also threatened, the president, who threatened to imprison thousands of these people because he continued to sue them in camps that were very reminiscent of Japanese detention facilities during World War II, military bases at huge financial costs.
In fact, I visited a facility very much like the one the president was considering, where $2,000 per person per day.
Think about it, $2,000 a day.
Hayes: $2,000 per person per day?
BLUMENTHAL: facilities at Tornillo per person in El Paso.
We are talking about economic costs, moral costs and humanitarian costs.
Hayes: OK, Senator Richard Blumenthal, thank you for joining me.
BLUMENTHAL: Thank you.
Hayes: Lawyer Natalia conillo is the director of the criminal justice reform program for the Texas Civil Rights Program, and they represent many people who have been detained and prosecuted by ICE.
First, let's start with an update on what's happening on the ground, because there's a lot of confusion.
Let me start with this.
Do you know that separation is still happening? Or has it stopped?
Natalia conillo, director of the criminal justice reform program for the Texas Civil Rights program: as far as I know, separation has stopped.
As of Friday and Monday, we did not meet parents who were separated from their children.
So our last meeting with parents who were separated from their children was last Thursday, the day after the executive order was signed.
Hayes: So there's a little bit of confusion between CBP, and it says we don't recommend drafters.
The Justice Department wants to go ahead and say that we're suing everyone because they have this zero.
They adhere to the policy of tolerance.
But you heard about the idea that the Texas Tribune reported that parents are basically offered, if you sign this agreement and agree to be deported immediately and give up your right to asylum.
Have you heard of it?
CORNELIO: We heard from relatives of one of our clients that he was told that he would be reunited with his children if he signed a voluntary resignation agreement.
We also heard from most of the people we interviewed that they would do everything they could to reunite with their children, so whether or not they were told CBP made it clear that in the absence of forced children, they don't have to make any decisions about immigration.
It's basically a forced decision, so we're worried.
Hayes: Is there any progress in informing your clients where their children are and how they can reunite with them?
The process is very slow.
It's basically in the hands of the Department of Homeland Security.
Of course, all this can be avoided if the parents are never separated from the children.
What we are doing now is to race as fast as possible to try to make sure parents are aligned with their children before something serious like deportation happens.
We know there is at least one case where the children are deported when their parents are detained in the United States, so that's a problem.
The children were deported?
Because we will-this is important-we have followed many cases in which parents were expelled during their child's detention, and you are saying the opposite.
Children are sent back to the country where they fled because of danger without their parents?
Colelio: Yes.
At least one case is like this.
Hayes: What do you think when you hear that the president of the United States is building a place you know, continuing to plan to build a camp at a military base-what does it say to you, or you are here to keep these children away from their parents and say that all these judges, all these legal statements are ridiculous.
We need to get them out of the country.
What do you say about this?
CORNELIO: I think the issue of the separation of parents from this child, if there is due process, this humanitarian human rights crisis, if people are entitled to a lawyer and able to meet a judge, will never happen.
So I actually think that, contrary to what the president said, the traumatic experience that the United States has just experienced can be avoided.
Thus, it is not only a violation of international human rights law and our laws, but what has just happened proves what will continue to happen if the appropriate procedures are not provided.
Hayes: explain it.
What do you mean?
CORNELIO: lack of due process, inability to access a court or hearing officer, inability to access a lawyer is a failure of the government
The transparent system made a thorough administrative decision to separate parents from children until, you know, civil rights lawyers discovered this and rushed to try to talk to parents, other than the government, anyone starts tracking this information.
So, if there is no due process, if there is no access to a court, a hearing, or a lawyer, the conduct of such a comprehensive policy may occur, these things protect the occurrence of human rights violations, civil rights violations and violations.
So this is an important check.
I think everyone should agree that there must be room to agree that civil rights and human rights must be included in any dialogue on policy.
We should note that the only reason we know this is not because of the government, but because lawyers in court are suing the matter and telling reporters about it.
When this policy happens behind closed doors in a black box, they are contacts and the children are being ripped off by their parents.
Natalia conelio, thank you for all you have done.
I appreciate it.
Colelio: Exactly right.
Hayes: I have a legendary journalist, Dan Laning, who is the author of Unite us: a reflection on patriotism.
You know, at this moment, I sometimes think of an instinct of historicism.
Oh, you know, it's never been so bad.
This is not normal.
I always enjoy checking in with you as you witness a long history of American history.
What do you think about the US president's public statement that we don't need the law, we don't need a judge, and we don't need due process?
Reporter dan rather: Thank you for letting me be here, Chris.
First of all, we need to see clearly, not the anger fatigue I'm talking about.
There are so many atrocities, one on top of the other.
What have you been saying-can he make it?
But we need you to see clearly that President Trump's words and policies, reckless, divided, seriously undermine our core national values, what brings us together
Now, it has been proved that the ballot box-centered political reaction says, don't forget that we have the ballot box, which will be decisive in the end.
On top of that, what the president is actually saying is not what he is saying, but that I am the law.
What the senator said earlier, he said there was no excuse.
He didn't even pretend the constitution was important.
It's important that he doesn't even pretend to have laws and precedents.
This is something new.
Yes, we have presidents who have tried to go beyond the Constitution before.
President Roosevelt put the Supreme Court together with many examples, but we never had a president who made it public without apologizing, and in fact, he said arrogantly that I didn't care about the Constitution or the law.
Hayes: that's what I think.
I mean, you make it very clear that Eric Holder basically says that you can kill an American citizen. S.
Citizens who do not have a judicial review, I mean, this is a very broad proposition put forward by the Obama administration, and the Bush administration made an extremely broad statement when I published the post 9/11.
But in all cases, Reagan, George W.
That is why this is valid within the scope of the Constitution.
It seems to me that the president has a new way of talking, just putting it aside and saying it's ridiculous.
On the contrary, it is not only a new way of speaking, but also a new way of acting, which is a vital thing.
If we accept this, not only did the president say it, but he also believed that the Constitution was important and that he was above the law.
This is an obvious sign of authoritarian progress.
We know that the Trump administration represents a dictatorship. leaning regime.
Hayes: At least melted.
Instead: Now, it is moving into all the features of a completely authoritarian regime, and all the things that we know from history that lead to this.
By the way, don't forget what happened at the same time. he is engaged in a trade war and raising tariffs, which not only isolated our friends and allies, but also weakened the economy.
We know from history that the trade war of the 1920 th century led to the Great Depression of the 1930 s, which in turn led to Nazism.
I am not saying that we are close to Nazism, I am saying that we have to learn from history, because you know that the judgment of history is often slow, but once it settles down, we know what happens when you are combined with authoritarian, and my most important thing is the leaders who are combined with trade wars, high tariffs and isolationism.
History is very clear. we forget it in danger.
Hayes: one of the things that impressed me is what kind of thing can suppress this impulse.
I mean, the court, you know, they overturned two versions of the travel ban.
They agreed to the DACA clause.
If the ACA is abolished, Congress has provided a little inspection.
What is your understanding of us-what we are seeing now is the people who organize and resist this policy outside the channels of the courts or Congress?
On the contrary: it is very important for people to resist and resist, it has a wider meaning and has resistance to each round.
Resistance to specific policies and organisational personnel between ballot boxes is very important.
Media, not self
Service, but my profession and your profession, what the president is talking about is a particularly important responsibility, do not get tired, continue the next story, continue to be under pressure.
We haven't had a photo yet at this late hour, no real photo in one facility after another, which is absolutely outrageous.
Hayes: I think-I want to make that clear.
I think that's the way you pronounce it on BuzzFeed and he shows that.
This is a government-released photo of a child calling from the tent city of Tornillo.
You can clearly see on the screen that there is no call, right?
No actual phone call. RATHER: Right.
Hayes: This picture was taken four days ago on the 21st.
It's obviously staged.
But your point is, we don't know, we can't-it's a black box.
We can't look at independence as a fourth industry, which should be real, real trouble and worry for everyone.
To be more precise, thank you very much for your time.
Thank you, Chris.
Hayes: Next, Maxine Waters called for condemnation of Trump officials, crowds fighting back in public, and then the president's attack on her.
Woman congressman Waters walked ahead with me.
After the break, the president's trade war began to clean up the first victims.
How does a company shift from a symbol of U. S. job growth in two minutes to now moving production and employment overseas. (
Business break)
Hayes: Donald Trump tweeted a few months ago: "The trade war is good and it's easy to win.
He is not the first world leader to believe in this and then no longer believe in this idea.
Tonight, in an ongoing real trade war he launched, the president found that winning was not as easy as he thought. Harley-
Davidson is an iconic American brand that Trump brought to the White House in last February as a beneficiary of its policies. Today Harley-
Davidson announced that it will transfer production of motorcycles it sells in Europe from the United States. S.
Go to factories overseas
The company said the move was to avoid higher costs from tariffs imposed by the EU last week. U.
This will increase the cost of each motorcycle exported from the United States by an average of about $2,200. S.
Thank you to the EU.
Now, why E. U.
Do such a thing?
This is in response to President Trump's order to impose tariffs on steel imports from core U. S. allies, including the European Union. U.
While Canada and retaliation did not end with motorcycles, manufacturers and farmers alike felt the pain of retaliatory tariffs.
According to a cheese maker in Wisconsin, if the export market is closed, I can see that we have reached the point where dumping milk in these areas will talk more about the impact of Trump tariffs on US companies.
Dan Dicker, a licensed commodity trader and marketing expert, also joined me, who has been writing to me.
While you're looking, we asked you to talk about steel tariffs when they first announced it.
What's happening now?
Commodity trader dan dicker: Well, when I spoke to him during the parade, we talked about the first round of tariffs, and in fact Trump gave up the idea a bit.
He saw the stock market diving into these announcements, and in fact, he gave up the announcements greatly from China and our allies.
But since then, he has almost doubled throughout the process, and since then, the market has been calling B. S.
Throughout the process of saying that you know, we don't believe that he can really do it unilaterally, launching a trade war for no reason to plunge the global economy into recession.
Keep in mind that the economy is one of the few real assets that the Trump administration must bring to the midterm elections and that he will throw away for reasons that no one can really understand.
Hayes: I think the dynamic is fascinating because I think you're right.
You know, there's a kind of journalist with Trump's sympathy that you should know, take him seriously, but not literally, and that's what his supporters do.
I think you know Wall Street doesn't take him as a reality.
That's basically what they do.
They now say he will not actually launch a trade war.
Dickerer: he's not going to actually go through this, the market has been stable and actually does a good job.
Unemployment has been low and the economy has been rumbling, but as we get closer to July, these first tariffs should go into effect, in fact, as the White House continues to threaten to increase the tariffs they already have E. U.
China began to take retaliatory measures against the measures they were going to take, and finally we got some Wall Street analysts, especially today Morgan Stanley and J. P.
Morgan said, hey, maybe he's not kidding, maybe he's going to really go through it all, and that's why the Wall Street avalanche is.
Hayes: we should be clear.
My understanding is that it's not just people pricing for the future, it's what's happening now.
Documents submitted by Harley to SEC
Davidson said today,U.
Tariffs increased from 6% to 31%.
This is not a fictional view.
We still have a week and a half of our tariffs.
In July 4 or July 7, they will impose Chinese tariffs on all kinds of computers and electronic products for the first time, and other Chinese will begin to raise tariffs.
It will be 4 billion kilometers from Mexico and 4 billion kilometers from Europe. U.
There are 17 billion kilometers from Canada, and the Chinese are threatening within 20 billion kilometers.
Now, Trump is surprised to think that he can win this war with stupid ideas, because we import a lot more from China than we import from us, so he can raise tariffs, so the final number is a bigger victory for him.
But unfortunately this way is not working very well and he will find it as real as a game of chicken and we are the only truck moving towards him.
How this really works.
Hayes: You know, I mean, it has always been thought of as a negotiating gesture, as a negotiating gesture, and as a negotiating gesture that I should say, there is a view that taking a tougher position in the negotiations with China, especially China, is not a crazy idea, which is urged by rational people.
We have to be fair. it's a 30-
A year of Chinese stealing intellectual property from the United States.
Unfortunately, this is a very complex problem and he is trying to solve it in a very simple way.
Like immigration, you know, I have a problem with immigration and I will build a wall.
This is a simple solution.
For a very delicate and complex problem, the tariff is a simple and actually a wrong solution.
Hayes: part of the reason is that they are able to retaliate against the target crowd they want to target.
Farmers in Iowa, for example, export large quantities of agricultural products to China.
China may cut off the link.
Dekel: Yes, there are, in fact, some specific companies that rely almost entirely on China in order to support them.
GM, for example, will go bankrupt immediately if China decides to target GM.
Apple is the best market in China.
If they decide to target Apple, if the Chinese decide to do so in retaliation, they may make the Apple stock spin down and become nothing. HAYES: Yes.
The question now is like what we have seen in the history of the world, right?
I mean, there's a reason for the trade war.
The question is who clicked on the pop-up button and how you got rid of it is not clear yet.
Thanks for joining Dan Dicker.
Thank you, Chris.
Hayes: Next, the president is targeting female Congressman Michael waters after she called on members of the Trump administration to protest publicly.
Congressman waters and I responded after that. (
Business break)
Hayes: The Trump administration's brutal decision to separate children from their parents at the border triggered a backlash against Trump administration officials and allies.
Not only online, but in Virginia, protesters broadcast recordings of homeland security minister Kirstjen Nielsen crying outside her home to detain immigrant children, when she appeared to be at home.
Nelson and senior adviser Stephen Miller were also verbally attacked by protesters while trying to eat at a Mexican restaurant.
Meanwhile, in Florida, Attorney General Pam Bondi left a movie theater where she came to see a documentary about Mr. Rogers and yelled at you, ask Mr Roberts if he will take it away-Mr Rogers will take the child away from his parents.
Most notably, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was asked to leave a Virginia restaurant called Red Hen over the weekend when the owner objected to her role in pushing and defending Trump administration policy, this raises a question about the government's ability to live a public life without facing public consequences.
My next guest expressed her feelings on behalf of Maxine Waters. (
Start Video Editing)REP. MAXINE WATERS (D)
California: If you see anyone in the cupboard at restaurants, department stores, gas stations, you go out, you create a group of people, you push them back and tell them, wherever they are, they are no longer popular. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: These comments have triggered a strong backlash between members of both parties and the president, and we should note that they lied and said-
What Waters said, it seems, then threatened her with violence: "Female congressman Macchine waters, a person with a very low IQ, has become a Democratic Party with Nancy Pelosi
She has just called for harm to supporters, and many of the Bank of America's supporters have once again become great campaigns.
Max, be careful with your wishes.
The president lied: "As you just heard, Maxine Waters has not called in any way to hurt Trump's supporters.
The Maxine Waters representative in California is now responding with me.
Madam, let me start here.
You didn't call for physical damage or attacks on people, but you did say to create crowds and fight back against them.
So I was wondering, are you concerned that people interpret this as an appeal to mob intimidation and use a lot of people in public places to threaten people, is that what you are calling?
What do you think? REP.
Maxine waters ,(D)
California: Absolutely not.
In fact, you are absolutely right and I am not asking anyone to be hurt.
The president lied again.
In fact, I believe in peaceful protests.
I think protest is at the heart of our democracy.
I think the Constitution guarantees our freedom of speech.
I think the protest is civil.
So I don't know why the president chose to say that and try to suggest that I did the harm.
In fact, the president has called for more violence than anyone else.
But let's not talk about this.
Let's focus on the children. that's all.
This is about the fact that the child was taken away from his parents' arms.
They were locked in cages.
They're in jail.
They're in jail. You name it.
Parents don't know where they are.
This government cannot tell us where they are.
These parents want to know where their children are.
Any parent wants to know where their children are.
Most parents in this country will feel absolutely angry about the situation where children are separated from their mothers and fathers, and that's what we have to focus on.
It is better for this government to develop a plan to connect these children with their parents.
That's what I'm talking about.
Hayes: So I heard your voice and I want to follow up on the questions raised by the editorial board of The Washington Post.
But first of all, I would also like you to respond to those Democratic colleagues who are a little alienated from your comments.
It should be clear to me that these people fundamentally agree with your policy, right, they oppose the family separation policy for their children.
They see it as outrageous and morally hateful, but we have Nancy Pelosi say so, trying to make America beautiful again and calling for civilization.
You have Chuck Schumer who has no particular voice or obvious voice on this particular issue, but he says that if they don't agree with you, I strongly oppose those claims of harassment
How do you react to those Democratic colleagues who say you're out of line?
Why are they telling you this?
Waters: they didn't really say I didn't meet the requirements, what they did was try to find a way to talk about civilization without attacking me or anyone else.
As the leader of the Democratic Party, I hope she will do everything she can to ensure that no one believes that Democrats are harassing anyone or creating any violence here.
I think she was very responsible when she said that.
They are not attacking me, they are making sure that people understand that we are focusing on children, and we are not focusing on this shift, especially on the voice and expression of the president.
Again, let me tell you that I'm focusing on the children.
I had a sleepless night about the fact that these kids didn't know-we didn't know where they were.
Parents don't know where they are.
Why can't the government come up with a plan to connect them and make it public so that we can all be more satisfied with the fact that they will be reconnected.
They should not be separated as they were originally.
The president will do everything he can to divert attention.
His name is me.
He's the name of everyone.
In fact, we expect him to do that.
But we expect-we are too close to the normalization of the president.
Listen to some of his statements during the campaign and since he became president.
I want to quote his statement of violence, "I want to hit him in the face.
Another statement of violence, "knock out their trash.
"Maybe he should be treated rudely . "
Then he went on to say, "try not to hurt him, but I will defend you in court if you hurt him.
Don't worry.
"If it's not about creating violence and supporting it, what the hell is it?
I did not mention this.
I talked about peaceful protests. HAYES: Right.
I just want to make it clear, though, that you don't think it's a good idea.
Like, you don't agree with the president's language there.
Wouldn't you ask people to threaten, intimidate or attack anyone?
I just want to make it clear on this point.
Waters: Absolutely not.
In any case, I will not support any violence, anyone being beaten or beaten, or saying to them, I have to get you out of jail.
The president is guilty of all this.
Don't forget, they created some of the most violent protests we 've ever seen led by the President of the United States.
I got it for the kids.
I gave it to my parents.
I hope that the children will connect with their parents.
I hope the president can come up with a plan that will make us all feel comfortable.
Now on the whole issue of immigration, he will even leave in another place.
He's confused.
But he did not promise us that he would bring the children back to their parents.
Hayes: Okay.
The president spoke in the crowd tonight, apparently talking about you.
He seems to have talked a lot about you.
Thank you for taking the time to be with me tonight.
Waters: Well, I hope connorman doesn't say anything. He’s a liar.
He's pathetic.
He is not credible.
The American people should get used to this now and know who we have as president, someone who doesn't deserve to be president of the United States.
Thank you very much.
Hayes: Thank you, honorable woman.
Waters: You're welcome.
Hayes: is Robert Mueller ready to close the investigation?
Update on what the special adviser will do in the future.
In addition, I hope you have already had dinner, because the first thing tonight and the second thing is the next one. (
Business break)
Hayes: first thing tonight, in the president's abuse of power, using Twitter to give angry negative comments about a local restaurant in Lexington, Virginia may not look too excited, unless he is the most powerful person in the world, use his power to intimidate a citizen because they exercise their constitutional right to oppose government policy.
"The Red Hen restaurant should focus more on cleaning dirty canopies, doors and windows.
Paint work is needed very much.
I always have a rule that if a restaurant is dirty outside, it is dirty inside.
"For someone who only sees photos of this place on the news, this is a very detailed review.
Hey, sorry for the unrelated restaurants with similar names.
Our president is not always so precise.
But it was a fun attack line after the cleaning of the restaurant.
This reminds me of an old saying that dirty flies should not throw stones.
It's the second one in 60 seconds. (
Business break)
Hayes: So today, when the restaurant owner and current US President Donald Trump slammed the Little Red Hen restaurant on Twitter for being dirty, reporters began to look into the obvious question, the answer was 15.
Trump's famous 2017 violation of the health code in March 15a-
Largo resort in West Palm Beach, Florida, including sushi without parasite treatment, hot dogs placed on the ground while walking
In the fridge, in the defective fridge, the meat is stored above the required 41 degrees F. During a three-year span Mar-a-
Lago received 78 cases of violation of the health code.
Vice News has compiled a list based on public records of hundreds of other violations of Trump's other properties across the country, including violations of the health code, in addition, it also violates building codes from live cockroaches and dirty flies-eeks-to water codes, fire code fines and environmental damage.
So the dirty stuff outside, the dirty stuff that Trump proposed for internal testing, well, it's not very good for him.
As for the food, Vanity Fair once reviewed the Trump Grill with loose gray Sichuan dumplings and loose gray guts on it, steak like t-
A hard-bang minivan on Fifth Avenue tastes like a mix of vodka and crystal lights and doesn't sound terrible.
As soon as I got home, I brushed my teeth twice and curled up in bed until I was sick.
Of course, it's all subjective, but the fact is important, like the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia, which Trump attacked, actually just passed the recent health check, you guessed it, zero violation(
Business break)(
Start Video Editing)
TRUMP: It is very important that I hereby direct the Defense Department and the Pentagon to immediately begin the necessary process to establish a space force as the sixth branch of the armed forces.
This is a big statement.
We will have the air force and we will have independent but equal space power. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: I admit, after a big tip I 've had, I sometimes want to say it's a big statement.
The public-the public and the media are clearly not the only ones to be surprised by the big statement the president announced last week.
According to NBC News, the creation of a brand new Army branch is also news for those who run the army: Defense Secretary James Mattis.
He was described by some as one of the few
The adults in the room were able to restrain some of the president's worst instincts.
But NBC reported that the president's attitude towards Mattis has cooled in recent months, partly because he began to believe his defense minister looked down on him and slowed down his policy directives.
As far as space power is concerned, the president may be more concerned about the reactions of different audiences. (
Start Video Editing)
We will reopen NASA.
We will go to space.
Crowd: Space Force, Space Force, space force.
Trump: space power.
Crowd: space power.
Trump: space power. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: Space Forces. Space force.
In fact, NASA has never shut down so they haven't reopened.
But according to NBC, Mattis is not only excluded from the president's big plan for future space travel, the defense minister was also excluded from a historic decision on one of the world's most dangerous conflicts: a nuclear standoff with North Korea. (
Start Video Editing)
Trump: We will stop the war game, which will save us a lot of money.
I don't think it's appropriate to play war games.
First, we saved a lot of money.
Second, I think they appreciate this very much. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Hayes: this is the focus of 60 years of debate, and it is reported that the president has decided to suspend joint military exercises with South Korea, a major concession to Kim Jong Un.
The United Nations has not even informed his defense minister, let alone consulted him.
With this, James Matisse became the most respected figure before joining the government, and he lost the dignity of Donald J. Trump.
Next, House Republicans are now asking for information about everyone in order to study Mueller's investigation.
The latest plot is to stop Mueller after a break. (
Business break)
Hayes: there was a show in politics yesterday that caught a lot of people's curiosity.
Mark Warner, a Democratic leader of the Senate Intelligence Committee, overheard the remark Friday night at a dinner party at his house in Martha's Vineyard, "If you give me another glass of wine, I will tell you only what Bob Miller and I know.
If you think you 've seen something wild so far, it's going to get crazy in a few months.
It is not clear how serious this comment is.
Warner later described it as "a bad joke ".
"For the record, no one really bought him that glass of wine.
What we know is that Mueller's investigation seems to be on a cliff.
Paul Manafort is now sitting in prison, Michael Cohen was searched by the FBI and publicly cooperated with investigators, the president's allies made a final effort to discredit the investigation before the hammer might fall.
Today, nine House Republicans asked Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to give them a list of all those involved in the Miller investigation, presumably to attack their credibility one by one.
To analyze the current situation, MSNBC contributor Natasha Bertrand, along with me, is a staff writer who reports on national security and Miller's investigation in the Atlantic;
MSNBC legal analyst Nick Ackerman, assistant special prosecutor for the former water gate incident.
Let me start with you.
Nick Ackerman from FRM.
Assistant prosecutor for the water gate incident: of course.
Hayes: I think, I'm listening to a new podcast about RFK, called the RFK file, and you're brought back to the list of enemies in 1968 and Nixon.
I think we often talk about the massacre on Saturday night.
But is there anything else-when you read that congressional Republicans are trying to get the names of everyone on the team, you are part of the team.
That's right.
Hayes: when you were working, did Nixon's people or his allies put pressure on you in other ways, or was it a new strategy?
Ackerman: there are some similar wit.
We're all labeled as the Kennedy Democratic Party. HAYES: Really?
The same thing.
Oh, exactly the same, absolutely the same.
But, you know, not with the same evil and the same persistence that you have here.
I mean, it's really an effort to undermine the whole investigation.
See what happened last week.
Miller must submit a special jury questionnaire to the court in Virginia in order to obtain the jury's question, to determine who is biased against prosecution what Trump and Giuliani have been doing for the past few weeks.
Hayes: Natasha, if I have a real problem with you, it's a disaster.
I saw that you sent this article, I saw it, I read it a few times and it was written by Paul Wood on the bystanders.
He told a few stories, I remember, and I don't know how to deal with sourcing.
That's what he said, and I want to hear your feedback on the story.
He said, "an American lawyer I know told me that employees at Cambridge Analytics found him after the election.
They received an email from Clinton more than a month before the release of WikiLeaks.
What should I do?
The lawyer replied, give this to Miller.
"Obviously, I mean, it would mean a huge deal if it was true, but I don't know what to do with the project.
What do you think?
Yes, Paul Wood is a very good reporter.
The only problem is that very few (if any) were able to confirm the explosive incidents he reported.
But it makes sense if you think about it, because if you remember, Alexander Knicks, CEO of Cambridge Analytics, did contact Julian Assange in the summer of 2016, it also proposed to include Julian Assange and WikiLeaks Hillary Clinton emails in the catalogue.
You know, it seems like a kind of deconstruction, very random, because how did Alexander Knicks know that Julian Assange had an email from Clinton, and if that was before the dump of the DNC file, does this mean a DNC hack and a subsequent leak, or does it mean a mail?
Is that an email from Podesta?
So this has always been a blur.
Emails from the Knicks to Julian Assange seem very, very casual, and we never get a good explanation.
So if an employee of Cambridge Analytics did contact a lawyer in the United States and ask him, hey, do I face any potential criminal liability here, because I knew at the time that Cambridge Analytics did have these emails and did give them to WikiLeaks, what should I do, and it is alleged that the reporter Paul Wood said, he replied, well, you should tell Bob Mueller this information.
Yes, this is a good point.
I forgot the part of Alexander Knicks.
The CEO of Cambridge Analytics is reaching out to Julian Assange and hopefully we can help you with these issues, which is for sure.
This is an established fact, we know.
So you are saying that if this proves this, it will have some knowledge of this aspect of it.
That's part of it, right?
We 've been looking for this connection, Roger Stone, Cambridge Analytics, WikiLeaks.
And this -- there's a crazy Eric Prince --
Side diagram related to this.
I'm curious about this news today, which once again shows how wide a web is and how many files and things Miller can access.
Prince said that the special adviser had obtained his phone and computer and that he had worked together and handed over various documents and information to Miller's team.
Ackerman: Yes, but I think what they're looking at is really what he said to the House committee and other evidence that he lied.
Hayes: this is almost an open and closed case in terms of what is publicly known.
That's right.
This is a man who claims that he is in Seychelles and happened to meet this one that happened to be . . . . . . Hayes's Russian oligarchs: hedge fund manager, yes.
That's right.
I mean, if you look at where the Seychelles is, I mean, take a map and it's like it's in the middle of nowhere.
You don't just walk into a bar in Seychelles and meet a friend of Putin without a plan, which is totally nonsense.
Hayes: So you think they might try to get others to accept false claims in the same way and hang them on it, do you think this could be Miller's series of inquiries about Eric Prince?
Hayes: Oh, I think they came from every aspect.
What you see is that I think you will see a significant drop in the indictment on Labor Day.
Miller hopes to finish the work in a timely manner so that he will not be accused of interfering with the mid-term elections.
He now has Cohen's files and he will be able to view, browse through the catalog.
He could have become Cohen.
He has two main witnesses. He’s got Flynn.
He’s got Gates.
He is building a case that he can prove without a doubt.
Hayes: We should also say that, in addition to Senator Mark Warner, everyone else has said that they hope something will happen in July and August.
Finally, manafort's being held in prison has indeed brought obstacles to his defense, and in terms of time, whatever Mueller does, there will be a trial against the former presidential campaign manager, like in autumn.
Bertrand: That's right.
The trial of Paul Manafort is scheduled for July.
Your trial with Padopoulos is scheduled for September.
We still don't know what will happen to Michael Cohen.
There are so many different factors at work here, all of which will happen before the mid-term
Term, so any idea ends before that fantasy.
I mean, with the exception of Roger Stone, each of us is having an interview with Roger Stone, so he's obviously going to be a big part of it.
Hayes: that's-Roger Stone's shoes, and a lot of people are waiting for it to drop, probably including Roger Stone.
Natasha Bertrand and Nick Ackerman, thank you both for your time.
Before we go, I'll post some interesting news on tonight's "Late Night with Seth Meyers.
Be sure to check.
Tonight at 12: 35 Eastern Time on NBC. It was a blast.
It's here tonight.
Rachel Mado's show is now on.
Good evening, Rachel.
This is a report card in a hurry.
This copy may not be in final form and may be updated.
Content and Programming Copyright 2018 MSNBC.
All rights reserved.
Copyright 2018 ASC Services II Media, LLC.
All materials here are protected by US copyright law and may not be copied, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC.
You may not change or delete any trademark, copyright or other notice in a copy of the content.