Melissa Harris-Perry, Transcript 04/05/15 - most popular restaurant breakfast dishes survey

MSNBC guest host Dorian Warren: My question this morning.
Should I tweet every thought I have?
In addition, the delicate details behind the ten-year deal.
McKay, do you want fries?
But first, how the 2016 election belongs to millennials. Good morning.
I'm Dorian Warren from Melissa Harris. Perry.
This week, when Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson announced that he would not sign the first religious freedom bill that arrived at his desk on Wednesday, it could be because it took him a long time, take a closer look at what his fellow governors have experienced outside several states.
In Indiana, Governor Mike Pence signed a similar bill earlier and tried to clarify that he did not really allow businesses to discriminate against homosexuality,, the initial strong opposition and resistance to Pence's decision was enough for Governor Hutchinson to hear all the way to Arkansas.
Considering whether to sign the bill, the governor said he was paying special attention to the voice of one of his closest critics. (
Start Video Editing)
Governor Asa Hutchinson (R)
Arkansas: There is clearly a generation gap on this issue.
My son Seth signed the petition and asked me, the governor's father, to veto the bill. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: Seth Hutchinson not only signed the petition, but he also wrote to his father, according to an introduction to the New York Times, expressed his concern about the bill's economy and reputation in Arkansas.
The young Hutchinson, unlike the governor of a woolly red Republican, is a progressive, a strongly backed union organizer
Labor and supporters of gay, bisexual and transgender rights.
In addition, unlike a 64-year-old father, Seth, 31, is part of a millennial generation.
It is not clear how much impact Seth had on Governor Hutchinson's request for lawmakers to amend the bill.
When asked in time by The Times, he refused to accept praise and said, "I have not shaken my father.
I think my dad is rethinking the issue because of the pressure from all sides.
"Maybe, but it's clear that when considering his son's opinion, the governor recognizes what's becoming more and more obvious to political leaders, especially if they're running for office.
Listening is wise when millennials speak, especially when the presidential election cycle begins.
Because sometime this year, AmericaS.
The Census Bureau expects millennials to overtake Baby Boomers as the largest living generation in the United States.
The number of millennials eligible to vote has increased by about 4 million per year.
By 2020, all millennials will enter the first presidential election of voting age, and they will account for nearly 40% of all Americans eligible to vote.
Of course, the number of eligible voters is not necessarily equal to the actual number of voters.
Millennials, like the trend of every generation of young people, have a lower turnout than their elders, and in fact, in last year's mid-term elections, this is already a notorious low turnout, especially among young voters.
Millennials have managed to stay at home in an unprecedented record number over the past decade, but with proper motivation, millennials voters can play all roles like President Obama did in 2008.
In 2008 presidential elections, voters between the ages of 18 and 29 were the only members of millennials, and young people overcame the indifference of turnout, which exceeded 2004 and increased by 2. 2 million.
In 2008, Young first voters were key to Senator Obama's victory in the Iowa primary.
Then they continue to take 34-
Before Senator McCain in the election.
The success of the Obama campaign that year was largely attributed to young voters who spent their time and energy on volunteers and grassroots campus organizers.
Now, the presidential candidate is trying to figure out how to harness the power of some millennials for himself as he looks ahead to 2016.
Perhaps nothing is more important than announcing his presidential candidate, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky this week, and the national daily reported this week that who has positioned itself as a candidate for young people.
According to The Wall Street Journal, young conservatives are becoming a pillar of his campaign strategy, not only a source of volunteers and energy, but also a source of voting.
Senator Paul tapped this source through campaign events on the university campus, snapshot chats and appearances on MTV.
He even started attacking his 2016 competitors and used his favorite method of upsetting his opponents to search online.
Paul has been bashing his opponents on Twitter and Facebook.
After Jeb Bush announced that he would be actively exploring the White House, Paul bought a Google ad that surprised the search for the Bush name, and Rand Paul Ade questioned Jeb's conservative credentials, and suggested that "join a campaign to shrink government rather than develop it.
"Of course, to impress millennial voters, there is also a need for more well-executed Internet shadows, because millennial clearly has put their claims on top of what is most important to them.
Seems to be in this era
The War of the old culture on social issues, they clearly put the flag on the progress.
Up to 68% of people have a good impression of the same thingsex marriage.
On the issue of immigration, 55% were in favor of undocumented immigrants obtaining citizenship, and 54% were in disfavor of the Affordable Health Care Act, the same number of millennials believe it is the government's responsibility to ensure health insurance for all.
While half of them are pretty sure they won't see a penny of social security, most of them also don't want to see their elders lose their benefits.
All of this makes more sense when you understand this, and millennials are the only group that votes to show that most people support a larger government.
If you are a Republican and want to win a new generation, you may find yourself doing a tricky political tap dance on social issues, and you don't agree with millennials
If you are Rand Paul, it means highlighting issues such as legalization of cannabis, criminal justice reform, and domestic espionage.
I hope they won't notice your objection. sex marriage.
This week, when the mountain reached out to understand his position on the Indiana Religious Freedom Act, we saw him do his best.
One representative told the newspaper, "Senator Paul was with his family and did not do any media for a week.
"For a generation, they expect the answer to all the questions to be just a tap, a text, a social media post, or a Google search box, the senator and his opponents in the class in 2016 will have to do much better than that.
Now with me is Sabrina Siddiqui, political reporter of The Guardian, staff writer of Roll Call, Neil lesnivsky, senior contributor to Yevgeniy fe, a researcher at the Manhattan Institute.
"Thank you for joining us this holiday weekend.
Michelle, I want to start with you and ask you, what is the 2016 incentive?
What are the key questions, in your opinion, and who are the exciting candidates?
Michelle Goldberg, senior contributor to the country: in fact, I think it's too early to say what is a key issue.
I don't think we know yet whether this will be a major foreign policy election and whether Iran will still be at the center of the debate.
I don't think Rand Paul is likely to be a candidate, but it would be very interesting to have an election between a more moderate, isolated Republican and hawkish intervention Democratic Party.
This will compete for political categories in ways we haven't seen for years.
I mean, you know, if I had to guess, it would be clear that the Democrats would be Hillary Clinton.
Unlike a lot of people, I think it is unlikely that Jeb Bush will be nominated.
I think there is a big difference between Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney.
I think it might be someone like Scott Walker.
I think the other thing that will appeal in the next election is women's and family issues, which is where she really stands.
Warren: what about young voters, especially young women?
Will they go to Hillary?
Will Hillary be attracted to them?
Is there anything else on the Republican side that young voters will see exciting?
Niels lesniewski, "Roll Call": Well, I think we need to distinguish between two different groups of young voters, because if you talk about young voters in the Republican primary field, in the general election, their social views may be completely different from those of young voters.
Although young voters in the general election may vote overwhelmingly for WHO Secretary of State Clinton or the Democratic nominee is, in the Republican primary, you will encounter an interesting situation, there you will have a group of young voters who may be passionate about Rand Paul on issues like marijuana, and of course what you are doing is a big assumption.
LESNIEWSKI: but where Ted Cruz is running a campaign at Liberty University, those are evangelists, but they are also millennials.
Warren: OK, you said we have to distinguish young voters, so I want to break down the population structure of this generation a little bit.
According to the Pew social survey, 57% of people between the ages of 18 and 33
White Hispanic
This number means that millennials are also the most diverse generation in American history.
So Sabrina, how does this number complicate our understanding of millennials when we are segregated?
Sabrina siddiqui, "Guardian": Well, I think one of the big things you'll see when it comes to millennials demographics is that it's particularly close to the Republican Party, because, as you point out, they have, been in trouble both among millennial voters and in terms of demographic statistics based on ethnicity.
They also fought against ethnic minorities.
So makeup is important.
But I think Niles is a focus when you say you have to look at the number of primary processes and conservative millennials and whether they support Ted Cruz like Rand Paul did.
Not exactly, but they tend to be more democratic than you go to the general.
I think when it comes to young voters, it's still mostly about social issues.
I think the Democratic Party will definitely portray the Republican Party as extreme on many issues --sex marriage.
They will work as hard as in 2012 to address the reproductive problems of women.
But the economy will also be an important part of it.
What will the recovery look like in a few years from now, and it remains to be seen, but the extent that millennials are excluded from the recovery, the high youth unemployment rate, will be a key factor, especially for Hillary Clinton, who either bears the burden of the Obama economy or can be critical.
Warren: jeviny, let me get you in very quickly because I want to be careful that we don't create the power fallacy of demographics.
So this is an era of diversity.
In terms of this diversity, will this necessarily lead to political power?
Yevgeniy feyman, a researcher at the Manhattan Institute: Absolutely not, I think one of the biggest factors will be how many millennials are voting, especially when you look at Hispanic and African-American
Americans, they tend to vote much less than white people.
So you can have a very diverse population that is not actually represented by voters.
Even if the Hispanic population does show up, I think it might be helpful for Jeb Bush or Rand Paul, because they have better potential than some of the other Republicans in terms of immigration.
Warren: We know they brought record numbers for Obama in 08, but it remains to be seen whether Hillary, Jeb or Rand can mobilize young voters in the same way.
Stay there and I want to bring the young people behind the super PAC "millennials" to Jeb Bush. That`s next. (
Business break)
Warren: the super-political council is often seen as a way for political heavyweights and super-rich people to spend money to influence elections.
For a California college student, the super PAC is a way to get millennials involved in 2016 presidential elections, especially a candidate, Jeb Bush. In January, 21-year-
Senior Lucas Agnew, a senior at Claremont McKenna College in Southern California, submitted documents to the Federal Election Commission, launching a new super PAC called "millennium of Jeb.
According to the "millennium generation of Jeb" website, the super PAC started with a unique goal.
Quote "Let Jeb be elected president of the United States in 2016.
"Joining me now from Los Angeles is the founder of Lucas agneur's" Jeb millennials "super PAC.
Good morning, Lucas.
Lucas agnew, executive director: Thank you for inviting me.
Tell me why Jeb Bush.
What do you appeal to him, and why do you think he is the right choice for millennial voters? AGNER: Sure.
Well, Governor Bush is a recognized leader on many of the most important issues for millennials, especially for millennials, two of the most important issues are job creation and economic growth.
As governor of Florida, Governor Bush created
During his tenure, 32 million jobs and Florida actually led many years of job creation across the country.
Therefore, from immigration reform to economic opportunities, we believe that if President-elect in 2016, Governor Bush will represent the interests of millennials very well.
Okay, so why Super PAC?
What do you want to accomplish?
AGNER: Yes, we are concerned about the low level of engagement among millennials.
You mentioned this, and in the 2014 midterm elections there is only one real vote for every five millennials.
It's about trying to find new and innovative ways to get millennials involved and trying to increase the civic engagement of millennials.
Warren: OK, new and innovative ways to get millennials involved, tell us how to plan to do that.
How do you get millennials excited about Jeb Bush?
Agnew: we need two-
How do we get millennials involved, first and foremost social media.
It's clear that social media is a huge tool for us because, to some extent, almost every millennial generation is on social media.
So find ways to attract them, whether it's political means or you're talking on social media about how Rand Paul tried, something like this, A large boot has also been developed on grass-roots networks across the country, such as chapters on university campuses.
We have chapters at Arizona State University, we have volunteers in Tulsa, in Homer, to New York City, and also to reach out to young professional groups and try to get millennials there involved
From social media to the development of ground networks, these are new ways we try to engage millennials and find traditional ways to engage and expand.
Warren: Okay, how's the fundraising going?
AGNER: here it is. here it is.
At the beginning, it was just me, an idea, a website.
So as far as we are concerned, we have developed a lot in the organization, now that we have started to run, we have certainly seen good feedback and fundraising is coming.
Warren: Michelle, I want to tell you that because you went to CPAC in February, this is the annual right-wing conservative meeting that you attended in previous years, but you wrote in the state, there are a few different things that scare you this year.
What's the difference this year, and what's the difference from previous years?
Goldberg: Well, CPAC, I 've been there for a long time, and since I'm not a millennial, it's usually or used to be a quirky show.
I remember going when you could buy a bumper sticker with no Muslims equal to no terrorists.
In this crazy fair ground game, you can throw a ball at the trolls, say the gay agenda above, and they really go out of their way to moderate these things, because they were aware of the social media era during the contest, anything of this was just an Instagram post from viral transmission.
So they really gave up crazy.
Even on the same issue.
Same-sex marriage, candidates disapprove of same-sex marriage
However, they have raised objections in relation to the rights or religious freedoms of many countries.
You don't hear anything about a man, a woman, the sacred things of marriage.
They crafted their message-it was more fashionable than in the past, with a modest gloss when designed.
Warren: you said, so I gave up the madness.
Lucas, I want to ask you because a lot of us think Rand Paul is seriously positioning himself as a candidate for the millennial Republican electorate.
How will your super PAC treat Rand Paul?
Agneur: Well, we won't really focus on other potential candidates, we just focus on President Bush and his message about the right to rise, for our generation, economic opportunities and how you create jobs are actually creating immigration reform and education reform.
So we're just focusing on Governor Bush showing millennials who he is, what he stands for, why you support him, and having millennials compare Governor Bush with other candidates.
Warren: Yev, let me get you in quickly and ask you the same question.
How Rand Paul will compete with Jeb Bush and Lucas for the super PAC that started as millennial candidates.
Feynman: So I think Rand Paul's advantage on Jeb is that he can really be tough on criminal justice reform and he will have a serious impact on big/small governments as well.
He will promote himself as a small government mainly through criminal justice reform.
There are other positions against the Fed that may not be too popular.
Warren: the Fed?
Yes, let's target the Fed.
This will inspire others.
Okay, stay with me.
Lucas Agnew is in Los Angeles. A.
Thank you very much.
Next, is the trendy Brooklyn office the key to the hearts of millennial voters? (
Business break)
Warren: according to US media reportsS.
According to the Census Bureau, 30% of millennials and parents live at home.
A Neilson report found that 62% of those who managed to leave the Bird's Nest would rather live in the city than in the suburbs.
If television's description of the city life of millennials is credible, among those who choose to settle in New York City, millennials choose to go to Brooklyn.
From HBO's Girls to the comedy center's vast city, to TVLand's new series, the "young" millennials seem to be riding the middle-class wave into the most
This means that VK's latest political tenant is in a unique position to get close contact with all of her millennial neighbors, as Hillary Clinton is reported this week) the unofficial campaign officially opened its new headquarters in downtown Brooklyn.
"Politico" first reported that a two-story lease for an office building was signed later this week, although former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was still supporting the new dig at Wednesday's event, York's First Lady Charlene McRae. (
Start Video Editing)
Secretary, can we expect you back to Brooklyn? May your headquarters be here?
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: everything went well. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: Okay.
So Sabrina, I want to ask you, what should we think of Hillary Clinton's decision to set her head in Brooklyn, and Michelle mentioned that this was the death Nell of the hipster Brooklyn?
Is this Hillary's strategic move?
SIDDIQUI: Well, I don't know if this is a strategic move, but if we talk about her appeal among young voters, she needs to do more than set up a camp in Brooklyn
The reality is that this is back to the outcome we discussed earlier.
Despite millennial voters leaning toward the Democratic Party, there is a gap in Hillary Clinton's enthusiasm.
There is no guarantee that they will show up as much as they did for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, although people don't think they will show up in 2012.
Just because she does represent an old political guard, which is why you at least see her making more efforts to influence the left and Elizabeth Warren for lack of better words, make more progress with equal income and position yourself as the samesex marriage.
Whether she can sell the case comes down to voter turnout.
So Niles, when we think of New York, we think of Manhattan.
Both money and power were concentrated there, but Hillary decided to go to Brooklyn.
She wants to be a hipster, right?
The reason she went to Brooklyn might not be the rent, so why not go to Manhattan?
LESNIEWSKI: Well, I'll consider comparing it to something completely different.
If she goes to Syracuse, yutika or Rochester and goes to the north, completely away from the center of the city, she may send a very different message.
People outside the metropolitan area of New York will not really tell it all.
When you don't live near Brooklyn, you will vaguely hear where the hipsters are and so on.
But I don't think that in general, people still think that it is still part of New York in the general sense outside of the area outside New York City or the Northeast Corridor.
Goldberg: There's a practical thing here too.
Many of the people who ran and reported the campaign live in Brooklyn.
In terms of recruiting top talent, you will meet a lot of people who don't want to move to Utica or Rochester and ride a 5-minute bike to work every day, they are very happy.
In addition, in terms of reporting on the campaign, this is the person reporting on the campaign, and many of them are hanging out.
If you are going to trade information and leaks in the bar at night, this is a very easy organic place to do.
Warren: Yev, I'm looking for you because Sabrina mentioned earlier that the issue of reproductive justice will be the most important in terms of young women.
So I want to read something from a national magazine earlier this year about the house women choosing to remove their names from the Republican bill, the bill will ban abortion after 20 weeks.
That's what Senator Renee Elmer said.
"I urge the leadership to reconsider raising this issue next week.
We had trouble last year and I think we need to be careful again.
We need to be smart on the way forward.
In an interview, Elmer said, "the first vote we conducted, the second vote or the fifth vote should not involve issues that we know about millennials, and social issues are not important to them.
"From the perspective of focusing on female millennial voters, will this affect the Republican strategy around reproductive justice, reproductive rights?
Feynman: Well, I really hope Republicans already know that if you're a white male between the ages of 40 and 60, maybe you shouldn't talk about women's reproductive rights.
If you do, you should do it in a very subtle way.
There is a better way to do it.
I think Republicans have learned from a lot of recent faux pas whether this will translate into a different campaign strategy.
This may just avoid the problem as much as possible.
When they can avoid abortion, don't talk about abortion, and don't talk about contraceptive methods, but it's something that Democrats and progressives will have an advantage over Republicans.
Warren: Michelle, I want you to respond to what Yev said earlier, because he said Rand Paul will use a smaller government framework to recruit millennial voters, but I would like to take a look at the racial views of millennials, or break down by race.
When you see a preference problem for smaller or larger governments, it's actually just
White millennials who like big government make up 71% to 39% of white millennials.
So talk to me about the demographic differences between millennials and how that will drive the attitude of big or small governments.
Goldberg: Well, I think race is more important than age in determining people's political attitudes, right.
So, the white millennials are not as different as the white-they are the same on some issues --
Sex marriage is a big problem.
But on a number of issues, they are tracking almost all other white voters, such as the white millennial who supported the Republican Party in taking over Congress in 2012.
Warren: By the way, in 2012, millennials were more supportive of Romney than Obama.
This is not the case in 08.
Goldberg: Yes.
So I think, you know, but when you're talking about the Republican primary, you're pretty much talking about just white voters, so Rand Paul has to visit these people.
At CPAC, there are a lot of young people participating, more than I 've seen in the past, and the important message is that the big government is terrible, you know, this is the information tailored for Rand Paul.
Warren: It's a good bumper sticker.
This morning, is the Iran nuclear deal a decade old deal?
But first, Pope Francis checked in on Easter Sunday. (
Business break)
Warren: look at the headlines this morning.
Thousands of people are in St.
This morning at the Vatican's Peters Square, Pope Francis celebrated the Easter mass.
The Pope called for peace and expressed concern about the many conflicts raging around the world, including Yemen, Iraq, Nigeria and Kenya.
For the first time, he publicly commented on the nuclear framework agreement with Iran and praised it as an opportunity to make the world safer. (
Start Video Editing)POPE FRANCIS (
By translation)
: At the same time, we hope that we will entrust the framework recently agreed upon in Lausanne to the merciful God, which may be a clear step towards a safer and brotherly world. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: in a war
The torn country mentioned by the Pope is a disturbing development.
In a recent video released, ISIS extremists in Iraq claimed to have destroyed a major archaeological site in the ancient city of Harrah.
The video shows militants smashing sledgehammer into the wall and shooting assault rifles at priceless statues.
But it's not clear when or when the video was made.
In this country, I was very upset in the last four games of the men's NCAA basketball championship.
The #1 seed Kentucky Wildcats lost their quest for perfection after losing to the Wisconsin Badgers last night.
Kentucky 38 years old
0 enter last night's showdown and Wisconsin wins 71-64.
On Monday night, Wisconsin will compete with Duke for the championship, hoping to win the badger's first national championship since 1941.
Next, Trevor Noah teaches us how to find our next job. (
Business break)
Warren: Trevor Noah had a really good week and a bad one.
The comedy Center announced that after Jon Stewart retires, South Africa will take over the "Daily Show" to provide him with one of the best jobs in comedy.
But then people started looking for dirt on Noah's social media and they found some.
Like this tweet from October 2011.
"Yes, weekend.
People get drunk and think I'm sexy.
Fat chicks everywhere.
"Or this in June 2010," South Africans know how to recycle, just as Israel knows how to make peace.
"Now, this old tweet has sparked strong opposition from Twitter, arguing that articles like Vox have little line between fun and offensive sex.
Trevor Noah was on the wrong side.
Howard Kurtz says disaster Daily: How Trevor Noah sees people who can't do anything.
Now, Noah defended himself on Twitter, saying, "simplifying my point of view to some unlanded jokes is not a real reflection of my character, nor is it my evolution as a comedian.
"The Twitter storm has swept the globe, but the comedy center has not given up its new host.
The network says Noah has a bright future in the comedy Center.
"The storm seems to be gone for the time being, and when Noah is at the helm of The Daily Show, he will definitely step on more toes.
"We can talk about jokes, funny or offensive all day, or both.
Should they in any way disqualify him from leading the country's most trusted false news source, but we won't talk about that.
Instead, I would like to ask some of the important questions that this event has brought to the rest of us, our profession, our privacy, our reputation in Twitter, in the growing public life on Facebook, instagram and the entire Internet.
Now with me, Sabrina Siddiqui, political correspondent for The Guardian, and Dorie Clark, author of Reinventing You and the upcoming stand out, "How to find your breakthrough ideas, and build a follower around it, "Tuwisha Rogers, vice president of brand leadership and strategy for TV One, creative problem solvers for desire factor Consulting, as well as Cole Strick, author of hacking into the future, privacy, identity, and network anonymity.
"Thank you for joining MPH this morning.
Towisha, I want to start with you and ask someone how to strike a balance between having a real online presence and posting something that might be harmful?
Tuwisha rogers, vice president of Brand Leadership TV one: First of all, I think we need to remember that, first of all, social media is an extension of who you are, not who you are.
Therefore, having an identity and first understanding who you are should be a prerequisite for how you appear on social media.
I think part of the problem is social media, for some people, social media has become a person who likes, personality, self, what kind of person they should be, instead of really being what kind of person, let the story shine.
So the balance is, first of all, don't try to follow social media and make it your platform.
Have a platform to be yourself on social media so you don't have this kind of problem.
So you're not talking about cat fishing.
Rogers: That's right.
No cat fishing, but I think
Awareness in social media is important.
Again, I think our society is looking for the next stage, the next big thing, not just being ourselves.
Cole, I got you in.
We know that the best example of a Twitter joke going wrong is PR Sacko, who is a PR executive who gets ridiculed online and then fired for tweeting "to Africa.
I hope I won't get AIDS.
I'm a white man.
"Why do we see this massive public humiliation online?
Cole Strick, author of the hack into the future: I think it has a lot to do with the need for a mechanism that punishes not necessarily illegal behavior, but flies in front of social norms.
We all know the stock of the Middle Ages and how you were thrown to you by Rotten Tomatoes.
Because everyone knows who you are if you live in your village.
With the development of the Internet, we are going through
Everything you say is permanent and the people around you know who you are. WARREN: The re-villaging.
Sabrina, let's talk about this.
When it comes to politics, it becomes evil.
There was a special humiliation around the political figures, and the best example was Jeb Bush's CTO, who was declared chief technology officer on Monday and resigned on Tuesday due to old tweets.
Talk to us about the role of people's personal social media history in politics.
SIDDIQUI: Well, I think we are increasingly living in a society that is no longer private.
If you are going to use public social media tools, you have to understand that your words may be used against you and people will accept them and try to extend them to your employer.
That's why employers are very defensive.
If you're a politician and you can't get people you 've just hired to talk about gender discrimination or racism on Twitter or Facebook, because it's going to extend to your campaign, there will be opponents who say this must be what you think as a candidate.
I think unfortunately there is now a line that has been crossed because there is a new blood movement that has also appeared, especially public figures.
I think that's what Trevor Noah is.
I think people are looking for something that can be considered offensive, not because they are trying to call for injustice, but because it has become a movement.
But politically, of course, I think candidates have to pay more and more attention to the digital footprint, not only for themselves, but also for the people around them who hire to run the campaign.
WARREN: Well, Dorian, I think this story is interesting.
Last month we saw Curt Schilling, a former Boston Red Sox pitcher, who actually tracked those 17-year-
Daughter including rape threat
Schilling said he knew nine trolls were out of work or kicked out of sports teams and said, "We're not over yet.
"So is this line crossed?
Should employees be fired for what they do and say online?
Where should the boundaries of enterprises be?
Dorie clark, author of Reinventing You: Well, it really involves the issue of judgment, because if you're an employer, you want to make sure that the people you hire can make a good judgment on work and off work.
I think this is very effective.
If someone crosses the line, you will want to know what they will do to the customer.
In the end, people like Curt Schilling will go after people, which is why people go to see Liam Nissen movies.
We want to see the bad guys down.
Warren: It's kind of Stalinist to me, but I want to react in the same way.
Yes, absolutely.
I think, as a spokesman for the former presidential campaign, this has indeed happened here.
Over the years, we have seen extremely strict scrutiny of politicians.
Now, the same level of scrutiny has been carried out for ordinary people.
For Trevor Noah, he's 31. year-old guy.
All of a sudden, he moved from small league to the biggest league in major league.
This is the comedy White House. he's not ready yet.
I think more and more people have to realize that as millennials rise in the workforce, that's what they're going to see.
Warren: Tuwisha, let me ask you a question, what mistakes do you see people make when they use social media to promote themselves or their business?
How do they prepare for being hired and keeping their jobs?
Rogers: As you mentioned, you are a brand, so you have to look at yourself as a brand 360 and what you represent.
Some of the mistakes I 've seen are that when brands don't have their own identity, when we chase a story or trend again, they're not real, they're not connected.
More importantly, when a see brand has a target audience and doesn't know how the audience communicates, or uses the right company to help you navigate what it looks like, they fail
So we need to be sensitive to who you talk.
We need to be real, connect, participate is very important, it needs to be bigger than insight or presentation, really understand what a person is looking for, what they are thinking, how they interact.
Today, I think especially millennials, they are so 360, so fascinating, they have this platform and it's very important to really get a deep understanding of who you're talking, what is the right way to communicate?
Okay, you don't go anywhere.
From top management to people living on the government, it's probably because YouTube videos have been uploaded. (
Business break)
Warren: two and a half years ago, the chief financial officer of a medical device company recorded his driving experience.
Through a chickenFil-
A restaurant that accuses employees of working in the company and the company's leaders oppose doing sosex marriage. (
Start Video Editing)
We are always happy to serve everyone.
Unidentified male: I don't know how you live with yourself and work here.
I don't understand.
This is a bad company. The values are terrible.
Unidentified women: we are here to provide you with any services you need.
Man: You should get better.
Rachel, you deserve better.
I hope you enjoyed your stay today.
Man: I will.
I just did something very good and I felt there was a purpose.
Thank you very much. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: Adam Smith, chief financial officer, posted the video to his YouTube page.
The video went viral online, and he was tortured by bullying employees.
Later the same day, Smith was fired from his $200,000a-year job.
In an interview with ABC's "20/20" this week, Smith said that he has been unable to find a job since then, and now he is on a food voucher, thanks entirely to that viral video.
So the panel, is this guy right now that he's out of work?
I think there's something wrong with him.
He is accusing an employee who may be there for minimum wage work, and he does not have many options.
This is not the best way to express.
You can post something online, but go to someone and harass her in this way doesn't work.
I think the company is still reluctant to get involved in social issues.
I was wondering how different it might be right now, because we're having conversations in Indiana and Arkansas about the Freedom of Religion Act, and companies are starting to get involved --sex marriage.
But, after employee Warren: Dolly, how to restore their reputation online once something like this happens?
Clark: The only way to restore your reputation online is to flood the Internet with more positive content.
Things on the Internet will never go away, but if you can push it back to 64 pages, you're also applying for a job with the FBI.
No one will find it, no one will find it.
This guy needs to start writing blogs about finance or anything else to clean up the history.
Rogers: Actually, I kind of agree and disagree.
I think you need to accept everything you do.
There is a story there.
I think we live in a society where human stories are important, right?
So if there is a lesson to learn, and if he admits that I am wrong, I may have gone too far, then something will come up, such as my redemption.
It's Easter today, right?
This is how I get out of the ruins and rise from the ashes.
But more importantly, regardless of the positive side, I think consistency is equally important.
If there is another small problem, your brand is almost inconsistent and no one will believe you.
Warren: Cole, I want to turn the script over because we 've been talking about people who post their own content and get stuck.
But what about those who haven't posted anything online, and what I'm thinking here is Monica Lewinsky, who describes her online humiliation in this way. (
Start Video Editing)
Monica Lewinsky: the experience of online humiliation is different from that of offline.
There is no way to end your thoughts where the humiliation ends.
No Borders. (END VIDEO CLIP)
So is Monica right? Is there no boundary now?
I think she's right.
I think it's more important than her experience of public humiliation that thousands of teenage girls face this kind of scrutiny every day in high school, in churches and everywhere.
We all know how nude photos were leaked and how the humiliation of slut people happened.
I think that while it is possible to call for corruption and other basic sins in places of power, I think we must also have some views.
Recognize that this person may not be supposed to be for the rest of their lives, especially when they are underage, because people will change and people will grow.
You shouldn't be held accountable for what you do as a 14-year-old. year-
Old, no matter how outrageous.
Warren: Tuwisha, I would like to come back and ask, how does the internet change the focus of private characters due to interactions with public figures, like Monica Lewinsky?
ROGERS: So I think now they have to accept the fact that there is the internet and there is a conversation going on.
But I kind of like flipping.
Instead of looking at the negative side, look at the positive side.
The Internet has access to the world.
You have the opportunity to reach people in different places, share a story, testify, and change someone's life.
If we think so, I think we will make better decisions about how to get involved.
Now we know that we have an audience who can do something to move the world forward rather than being selfish, not thinking or inconsiderate-not thinking about what our influence is doing.
So that's what I think.
Warren: we will take selfies here during the break.
Thanks to Tuvisa Rogers and Cole Strick.
Sabrina and Dolly will be after an hour.
Next, the complex details of the nuclear deal with Iran, as well as the more complex domestic agreement politics.
Also, is mcraise a good deal for workers or just some corporate clowns?
More nerdland at the top of the hour. (
Business break)
Welcome back. I'm Dorian Warren from Melissa.
The response to the historic agreement reached by Iran, the United States and five other countries continued this morning.
After 18 months of negotiations, the parties reached a preliminary framework on Thursday to curb Iran's nuclear capabilities.
The landmark agreement between the two countries is considered one of the biggest achievements of the Obama administration, which has been hostile for decades. (
Start Video Editing)
President Barack Obama: It's a good deal.
Deals that meet our core goals.
This framework will cut off all ways for Iran to develop nuclear weapons. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's foreign minister and chief negotiator, sounded optimistic, but he said cautiously, "We have serious differences with the United States.
We have built mutual distrust in the past, so I hope that some trust can be remedied by bravely implementing this, but that's what we all have to wait and see.
Now, the two did not finalize the final text of the agreement until June 30.
But from now on, we know that under the framework, Iran will reduce the number of operating centrifuges, reduce the inventory of uranium enrichment by 97%, and redesign the arak reactor, make it impossible to produce weapons-grade plutonium.
More visits and information are provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency and the agency is allowed to investigate the location.
In return, under the framework agreement, the United States and the European Union will lift many sanctions against Iran.
This morning we will look at the story from multiple perspectives.
But first, I would like to ask two NBC journalists, John Yang of the White House and Ali Arouzi, director of the NBC Tehran Bureau.
John, let me find you first.
Ask you, how satisfied is the government with what they got from this agreement?
John yang, White House correspondent for NBC News: Dorian, here they say they are satisfied.
They felt they had to make some concessions and they described them as face
Reserve concessions for Iranians, but I think the challenge is that a lot of what they think is good is very complicated and very scientific.
They are talking about real nuclear science, the ability to develop nuclear weapons from nuclear materials.
It's hard to explain to skeptical lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including many Democrats, so I think you'll hear a lot of the monitoring systems they're talking about right now-this agreement is going to set up a strict monitoring system so they can see what the Iranians are doing
You'll hear the radical phrase of the Reagan era, it's not based on trust, it's based on validation-Dorian.
Warren: now we're going to Tehran, and Ali arroyce of NBC is contacting us by phone.
Ali, talk to us about the local reaction in Iran, as news of the agreement is coming.
NBC News Chief Correspondent Ali arruzi of Tehran branch (on the phone)
Interestingly, last night, Foreign Minister Zarif gave an extensive interview on a talk show in Tehran.
He spoke to Iran's dubious neighbors and the international hardliners.
He said Tehran would be able to resume its nuclear activities if the West withdrew from the deal, which will be finalized in June.
Zarif and the chief nuclear negotiator also said Iran has the right to act accordingly and we will be able to restore its nuclear program to the same level if the other party does not comply with the agreement.
The accession to the nuclear agreement framework in Switzerland was not binding until June.
He also objected to Senator Kerry's use of the term suspension rather than termination of sanctions against Iran, adding that, iran has officially complained to the United States-the measures listed in the US statement contradict those actually accepted.
So there is a lot of political struggle here, but the country is still waiting for the opinion of the most powerful person on the supreme leader, who has been silent so far. Back to you.
Warren: Ali arroyzi from Tehran and John Young from the White House. Thank you.
Join me this morning at the table in New York, the Guardian's political correspondent Sabrina Sidiqui.
"Niels Lesniewski, the staff writer named.
NBC News foreign correspondent Ayman Mohedin
Michelle Goldberg, a senior contributor to American magazines.
First of all, I want to go to Hillary man leweite in Washington, DC. C.
Hillary Clinton, the show has been telling the story for months.
She is the author of the book "go to Tehran: why the United States must accept the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hillary, as far as I know, you did lead the negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister before.
Let's start with the basics here.
In your assessment, is this a good deal or a bad one for the USS. and why?
Hillary Mann Levitt, author of the book go to Tehran: I think it's a very good deal for two main reasons.
The first is about diffusion.
This will enable US policy makers to turn to international inspectors and supervisors, scientists, to really understand what is going on in Iran, not the neo-conservatives in Washington and other agenda-driven groups, they mistakenly told us that, for example, in Iraq, nuclear weapons could justify the invasion.
This will provide an objective basis for our decision.
What's more profound is the strategic opportunity that this potential agreement may bring to the United States to free us from the incredible self.
The destructive pursuit of war after the war, after the failure of military intervention in the Middle East, especially since 9/11, military intervention failed.
So that we have the opportunity not to do so to build more constructive relations with all the major countries in the region and to reduce our dependence on some of our allies, the policies adopted by these allies are often reckless for the United States. S.
The interests of Israelis, Saudis and others.
Warren: So, let me play part of President Obama's weekly media speech and get your response. (
Start Video Editing)
Obama: they, the United States and our allies and partners have reached a historic understanding with Iran that, if fully implemented, will prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
As president and commander-in-chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people, and I believe that if this framework leads to a final comprehensive agreement, it will make our country, our allies, our world is safer. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: So it's not a weekly media talk, it's the president's speech on Thursday.
But I heard him say, I want to know what you think about it.
I heard him say that this is about the issue of security in the area of reducing nuclear weapons.
I would like to know if there is something more complicated here.
Because if we lift economic sanctions against Iran in exchange for an end to its nuclear program, shouldn't we worry about Iran as a country that supports terrorism, will a series of evil things be done with extra billions of dollars in revenue?
I think President Obama can take two lines.
One is the cooperation route between Nixon and Kissinger and China. this is a fundamental reform of bilateral relations and a real strategic adjustment. this is a historic breakthrough, I think it not only saves the United States from a deadly war with China, but also enables us to get rid of Vietnam's strategic dilemma and stop our military intervention in Asia.
Something very beneficial to the United States.
It enables us to look at China in different ways.
We don't see China today as our best partner, but the way we see it is completely different from when we demonize China at '50' and '60.
This is an opportunity for Obama and Iran.
But I think what he's after is more about the way Jimmy Carter, President Carter likes it.
When he negotiated a deal with the failed Saudi coalition seeking control of the two armies, Congress killed it.
Because if you can't look at your opponent in another way, there's not a good enough deal.
There is no good deal with an evil Islamic Republic of Iran, just as Jimmy Carter found out when Congress was killed what was good with the Soviet Union.
So I am concerned that President Obama unfortunately took President Carter's line, which made Iran a demonized comic in American discourse.
Because in fact, today is Iran fighting ISIS, is Iran fighting al-Qaida, is our ally, for example, Saudi bombing in Yemen, so that al-Qaida can take over more and more territory there.
It was another city in Syria that Saudi Arabia supported al-Qaida to take over.
It won't-it won't be good in the end for the US.
We know where this trajectory is going.
It leads to more and more wars.
He needs to make strategic arrangements on China like Nixon and Kissinger.
So, let me bring in the Foreign Reporter of NBC News, Ayman mocherdin.
Ayman, I want to play what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanya said this morning on NBC's "meet with the media" and get your reaction. (
Start Video Editing)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin netner: before it left
We have a remarkable state of terror in our time with a huge nuclear infrastructure.
It is an agreement that gives Iran the ability to produce materials for many nuclear bombs, and it has lifted sanctions almost ahead of time.
Iran will therefore have billions of dollars flowing into its coffers, not for schools, hospitals or roads, but for launching its global terror machine. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: So, Ayman, how did America do it? S. -
The Israeli coalition is involved in this agreement and ongoing negotiations, and they are trying to reach a final agreement by the end of June.
Foreign correspondent ayman mohyeldin, NBC News: Well, I think it's a huge factor for the United States at home. S. politics.
We know that from now until the end of June, Israel may do everything it can to show its position to members of Congress, trying to do everything it can to lobby Congress to prevent the deal or try to supervise the deal as much as possible.
Could even try to break the deal.
There is no doubt that Israel believes that it is not a good deal from any point of view, as is the case with the argument we have just heard from the Israeli prime minister.
But I think we're in a position like this. S. is re-
Assess all its relations with Saudi Arabia and Iran in the Middle East, and of course the tensions between Israel and the United StatesS.
I got to the front because of Iran.
For the first time, the Iranian nuclear issue has created a little political disagreement between the United States and Israel over a key foreign policy national security issue.
Warren: Hillary, I want to get back to you because Ayman just mentioned the politics inside the US and what role this is going to play.
But I want to ask you shortly about the role of Iranian clergy.
How likely are they to move the deal forward, and what are the other internal political challenges facing Iran's leadership?
Levitt: You know, the Supreme Leader has supported these negotiations since the beginning, and he has said it repeatedly and publicly.
The children who caused the negotiators revolution, warned them to be careful not to be deceived by the United States, but supported them from the beginning, just as I did when I negotiated with the Iranians on Afghanistan after the 9/11 incident.
He even publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks on the United States in Friday's prayers, which our other allies in the region, especially the Saudis, did not do.
So I think the Supreme Leader is often ridiculed here as some sort of, you know, in fact, he's a very honest shooter who supports reasonable negotiations with the United States, I think we will continue to see that.
In Iran, however, there will continue to be concerns about whether the United States can stick to an agreement to lift sanctions.
You know, no one in Iran missed the letter from Senator Cotton, and 47 senators said that if the Republicans were the next president, they would withdraw the letter with the pen logo. WARREN: Right.
No one will miss it.
So I don't think the Iranians are panicking, or, you know, the negative reaction is focused on the United States. N.
International guarantee.
They are a very rational and complex actor, and it is important for the United States to maintain a good relationship with them.
Warren: Thank you so much to Hillary Mann lefrit in Washington, D. C. C.
When we came back, I wanted to bring the rest of the group to the studio to see if the Republicans were determined to destroy this potential history --making deal. (
Business break)
Warren: if it is difficult to reach an agreement with Iranians, President Obama knows that he may face the same serious challenges in gaining Republican support --
Control Congress agrees to such an agreement.
Although he touted the preliminary news of the framework agreement on Thursday, the president informed Congress. (
Start Video Editing)
Obama: If Congress kills the deal, not based on expert analysis, and does not offer any reasonable alternatives, then the failure of diplomacy will be blamed on the United States.
International solidarity will collapse and the path of conflict will be widened. (END VIDEO CLIP)
Warren: but it's clear to the Republicans that they didn't join.
Arkansas Senator Tom Coton has become a key critic of the Obama administration's fight for the deal and vowed on Friday to stop it.
The senator said in a statement, "there is no nuclear agreement or framework with Iran, there is only one dangerous list of the United StatesS.
The concessions that will put Iran on the path of nuclear weapons.
Nor will these concessions help to stop or challenge Iran's illegal activities.
After a visit to Israel, House Speaker John Boehner said in a statement that the Iranian regime would not continue to use its nuclear program and any economic relief that would further destabilize the region.
Niles, I want to ask you first, can Congress break this agreement?
What is the power of them to do so?
Talk to me about the role of the Democratic caucus here.
LESNIEWSKI: Well, it's going to be the Senate Democratic caucus, and in particular, it's probably going to have the most important progress in the end, because Congress, in particular, anything that the Senate is finally trying to stop this agreement is to overcome President Obama's veto, and 67 votes are needed, and will always come.
Warren: then break it down for me. A veto.
The president has the right to negotiate the agreement.
Yes.
Then Congress can pass a law that requires them to supervise, right?
Yes.
They can pass a law that requires their approval, or they can even try to impose new sanctions despite an agreement, which is even a step beyond that.
However, any one of these things needs to be able to get the president's signature, which in this case certainly won't, or be able to get a vote that covers that signature.
Now, you know, overthrowing the veto. WARREN: Right.
LESNIEWSKI: Anyway, it needs the consent of some Democratic senators.
Now, we have recently heard that the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees the bill, does not seem to have the 67 votes he needs.
So, you know, it seems like there's time to get it, but we'll probably be back on this again in June. WARREN: Right.
So, Ayman, I want you to come in, ask you about the Republican caucus in the Senate, and ask what role Bibi Netanya is playing here?
How much power and influence did he have in Congress?
MOHYELDIN: Well, I think you can look at it directly and indirectly from two different angles.
You know, he's going to run for public because he's had several rounds of coverage in the media today, and of course, we're going to look forward to similar advocacy from all levels of government in Israel, but you can also expect it from pro
Israel lobbied within the United States, and they also shared those views in an attempt to bring them to the forefront of the Republican agenda in any way, form or form.
I think that when you have some of the closest allies of the United States, France, there will be a basic question to ask here, and the UK that obviously supports this deal has a close America with you. S.
Allies who is not, from the domestic situation in the United States, how will this developS. politics.
S. Republicans will consider whether America's closest allies in Europe support the deal, saying they want it to be done, or they will let Pro
The Israeli lobby and the Israeli camp said it was not a good deal.
I think that will raise a fundamental question, that is, the national security policy of the United States, and who it will listen to within its allies when it comes to this nuclear initiative.
I think this is a very important issue.
Warren: Michelle, are members of Congress trying to do responsible oversight here?
This is not a matter of skill.
I mean it.
Or are they just trying to kill the deal anyway?
Goldberg: I think they just want to kill the deal anyway.
I mean, we talked about, you know, whether Iranians can be trusted to support the end of their deal because they have all these crazy voices and they still say they want to destroy Israel
Well, we have Senator Mark Kirk, who has been talking about the mushroom cloud over Tehran. You know?
So, we have our own radical priests if you want, and yes, if they can get-they may not be trusted if they can get support to kill the deal.
MOHYELDIN: in order to ask this question quickly, let's not forget that from Iran's point of view, it was the United States that overthrew the Iranian government in the 1950 s, iran's political leadership and the legacy of ordinary Iranians make it difficult for ordinary Iranians to trust the United States when they know that the CIA is involved in the long-standing evil legacy, even recent events in the region have made the Iranian government very suspicious and suspicious of the United States. S.
Intentions in the region.
So the historical background here is very important.
We can't erase history. All right.
More will happen after the break-I will have Sabrina here to give more input on the Iran nuclear deal. (
Business break)WARREN: Okay.
We have been talking about the Iran nuclear deal.
Sabrina, I want to ask you first.
There is an argument that this is what my colleague at Austin Dragon, Colombia, has put forward that an agreement is actually useful for congressional hawks who want to bomb Iran.
The reason is that because of this agreement, we will actually collect more intelligence through the inspection process to make military operations more effective.
How do you react to this?
SIDDIQUI: Well, I think that's totally justified, but it's an oversight to argue a reasonable point with Republican hawks in Congress, because obviously, when you see the opposition, this is only inherent to Republicans.
Before the details of the agreement are announced, you have seen the campaign they launched in an unprecedented manner, inviting Netanyahu around Obama, sending 47 Republican lawmakers to the Iranian leadership to sign
The key, I think, is the Democratic Party.
According to the White House, Israel is no coincidence either, they told the Wall Street Journal that they are revealing details of the deal to Democrats in Congress who are trying to influence Democrats.
Because they realize that it's going to be about those, you know, seven weird Democrats who are stripping and joining Republicans and trying to overthrow the president's veto.
They are key people.
The biggest thing Obama will have to face is those who face it again.
Elections and those who don't have the best relationship with the White House.
Warren: But Ayman, I'm really driven by this argument, why shouldn't the president lobby Republicans to say, hey, you want to bomb Iran?
I will give you better information.
MOHYELDIN: Well, you know, from the arguments he made this week when he spoke to the American people, I'm not sure if he made that very clear.
There are three ways we can get nuclear bombs, uranium, plutonium and secrets.
The way to solve potential secret bombs is a priority for the United States.