safety regulations for dishes in a hotel or restaurant 2017 What are Environmental Ethics?
Environmental ethics is a branch of environmental philosophy, which studies the ethical relationship between people and the environment. This area provides a new dimension to the theme of protecting natural resources and protecting the environment. For more information on environmental ethics, please read this helpful article. Environmental ethics is a philosophical discipline that studies the moral relationship between human beings and the environment, as well as the value and moral status of the environment and its non-human content. -The definition of environmental ethics is based on the principle that there is an ethical relationship between man and nature. Humans are part of the environment, and so are other creatures. When we talk about the philosophical principles that guide our lives, we often overlook the fact that even plants and animals are part of our lives. They are an integral part of the environment and therefore cannot be deprived of their right to live. Because they are an integral part of nature and are closely related to our lives, the guiding principles and moral values of our lives should include them. They need to be seen as entities with common rightsExist with human beings. We deny this right to life by destroying nature. Such behavior is unfair and immoral. The Food Network clearly shows that humans, plants, animals and other natural resources are closely linked. We are all products of nature. we depend on each other and the environment. Respect not only the existence of others, but also the existence of non-human beings. Recognizing the right to exist as a human entity is our primary responsibility. . It is also one of the factors that lead to the development of environmental ethics as a separate research field. When the field was first discussed in academic journals in North America and Canada, it was promoted. At the same time, this area has also emerged in Australia and Norway. And environmental activists, who lead philosophers to consider the philosophical aspects of environmental issues, as a branch of environmental philosophy, are in a leading position in the development of environmental ethics. Environmental ethics is a widely discussed topic today. It covers such aspects as the ethical principles that guide our use of natural resources, our obligation to strive to protect the environment, and our moral responsibility to animals. Our natural environment is not a warehouse where resources are looted. It is a vital resource reserve for the existence of life. Their unscrupulous consumption is not good for our health. being. We are cutting down the forest for our home. Our excessive consumption of natural resources continues. Improper use of resources leads to resource depletion and endangers the lives of our future generations. Is this ethical? This is an issue of environmental ethics. When the industrial process leads to resource destruction, is it not the responsibility of the industry to restore the exhausted resources? In addition, can the restored environment make up for the original environment? The mining process destroyed the ecological balance in some areas. They hurt animals and plants in these areas. Slash-and-The incineration technology is used to clean up the land, resulting in the destruction of forests and forests. The land is used for agriculture, but is the loss of so many trees compensated? Many human activities lead to environmental pollution. The growing population has increased the demand for natural resources. Because the population exceeds the carrying capacity of our planet, animal and plant habitats are being destroyed in order to create space for human habitation. Huge buildings (roads and buildings for residential and industrial use) are built at the expense of the environment. In order to allow space for these buildings, many trees have to lose their lives. The animals that thrive in them lose their natural habitat and eventually lose their lives. However, cutting down trees is rarely even considered a loss of life. Isn't that immoral? Due to the loss of habitat, animals may enter human settlements, thus posing a threat to people living there. In some cases, the animals are killed. Secondly, animals are the food source of human beings, and they are killed. In addition, animal research causes harm to animals and even causes them to die. This destruction has led to the extinction of many animal species. The number of other animal species continues to decrease. How can we deprive animals of their right to live? How do we deprive them of their habitat and food? Who gave us the right to hurt them for our convenience? These are some of the ethical environmental issues that need to be addressed. An important issue in the field of environmental ethics is thatPeople only have the value of tools, but they still have intrinsic value. "Nature creates everything for the sake of man," said Alice Dodd, which meansPeople only have the value of tools,They are considered "tools" of human beings ". From the perspective of the human Center (emphasis on human beings), it is correct for human beings to use other biological elements in nature. It is only because it will eventually affect human life that it is wrong to cause harm or destroy them. be harmed. . Lynn White, historianPublished an article in 1967 in which he criticized Jewish-Christian thought is one of the main factors that lead to human use of the environment. He, this gives him the right to use it. White also criticized the father of the Church, who insisted that God created man in his own image and gave him the right to rule everyone on Earth. According to White, this view advocates that man and nature are separate, not part of nature. This thought leads to the development of nature without realizing its intrinsic value. American writers, scientists, environmental activists, ecologists, Forest and Nature protectors. His view of ecological center plays a leading role in the development of modern environmental ethics. Believe that man is the most important thing in the universe. According to eco-centralism, there is no difference between human and non-humanThis means that humans are no more valuable than any other component of the environment. Human beings, as well as other components of plants, animals and nature, have inherent values. It is our moral duty to protect species because they have intrinsic value. In his view, the disappearance of species means disrespect for the process of natural species formation. . Therefore, any act of ignoring the environment is immoral. It is worth discussing in this regard. The idea that plants have certain rights that humans and animals have. Philosopher Tom Reagan argues that animals and humans are entitled to rights because they are "aware" of their own existence, which does not apply to plants. Philosopher Paul Taylor believes that plants have intrinsic value and that they have the right to be respected but not to be entitled. On his 1972 sheets of paper, "should the trees stand? If companies can be given rights, trees should also be given rights, he said. . We are endangering the lives of future generations by causing environmental degradation and resource depletion. Isn't it our responsibility to leave them a good living environment? Non-Rapid development of renewable energyIt is frustrating that it is impossible to supplement them. This means that they may not be able to serve future generations. We need to strike a balance between our needs and the supply of resources so that future generations can also benefit from the use of resources. We are morally obliged to consider the needs of other factors in the environment. They include not only other humans, but also plants and animals. It is ethical to make fair and responsible use of natural resources to these elements. in nature. For development and convenience, is it morally correct to burn fuel, even though pollution is caused? Is it morally correct to continue technological progress at the cost of the environment? Climate change is known to have a negative impact on plant diversity. In fact, the increasing pollution is not only harmful to human beings, but also to plants and animals. In view of this, is it not our moral responsibility to protect the environment? We have a certain responsibility for the environment. Our approach to other biological entities should be based on strong moral values. Even if humans are considered a major component of the environment, animals and plants are equally important. They are entitled to a fair share of resources and a safe life. Different religions have their own theories about how the world is created, encouraging the idea of protecting the environment or protecting nature, because natural elements are associated with the highest power to create them. In some religions, certain plants or animals are worshipped as sacred or as symbols of a particular god. Natural worship is part of many religious and spiritual activities. It goes on to say that all religions pay attention to the environment and attach importance to its non-Human component. Further from environmental ethics is the radical ecology, which says to extend ethics to non-Human elements in the environment, it is necessary to change our way of life and function. Put environmental protection as shallow and deep. . They believe thatHuman elements have an intrinsic value that does not depend on their utility to human beings. They believe that it is necessary to take measures to reduceThe human world that causes biodiversity destruction. Naess believes that human beings should expand the concept of "self" to include other forms of life. In his eco-He said that the field of environmental ethics is not limited to the realization of our moral obligations to the environment. . Some may think that the principles of deep ecology are not enough to solve environmental problems, but advocates of this ideology believe that once the state of "environmental awareness" is reached, human beings are obliged to protect the environment. with nature.